1050-1069 Rome & Constantinople Split, Norman Conquest
This twenty year period covers the reign of King Edward the
Confessor who, along with his successor -- his brother-in-law, Harold
Godwinson, son of the Earl of Wessex -- was killed in the 1066 Norman Conquest
of England led by William the Conqueror.
In 1054 the Arabs had conquered West Africa -- enslaving the Africans in the same manner as theNormans later enslaved the
English; and in 1054, too, the final
schism took place between the Roman and Constantinople
churches.
At the time of the Battle of Hastings in 1066 -- the defining event of the Norman conquest ofEngland
-- thousands of good people lost their lives defending their land and country.
In 1054 the Arabs had conquered West Africa -- enslaving the Africans in the same manner as the
At the time of the Battle of Hastings in 1066 -- the defining event of the Norman conquest of
Had the Normans been
barbarians the English might have understood their cruelty and greed, but they
were Christians, ostensibly under the spiritual guidance of the Pope in Rome , just like the
English were.
So much for Christian fellowship and ‘western’ civilization!
So much for Christian fellowship and ‘western’ civilization!
And yet, looking at the bigger picture – particularly the
Spanish Reconquista and the Holy Land Crusades which happen with regular
frequency from now on – what the final schism between the Roman and
Constantinople churches in 1054 could represent is a fight-back against
theological bickering and luxury living that had caused the Eastern Empire to
collapse to the Moslems in the first place.
1054 may represent the Western Christian church leaders
saying, in effect, we are not going to allow the Moslems to invade our western
lands in the manner they invaded our eastern lands, and if that means we need
to put theology aside in order to fortify our position by putting strong kings
into vulnerable lands then so be it.
That so many Popes were now German, rather than Roman – as a
result of cleaning up the corruption that previously existed in the Papacy – no
doubt accounts for this new focus.
The British Isles were
obviously vulnerable to invasion – having been invaded so many times by so many
peoples over the centuries – so perhaps the Norman Conquest of England in 1066
was a tactical move which spared the English from a Moslem invasion?
In other words, rather than remaining tied to Constantinople
and concentrating on theology while the Moslems advanced further into formerly
Christian lands, the break with Constantinople and the sanctioning of the
Norman Conquest of England presaged the start of a strong, new, revitalised and
militarised western civilization based upon fortification and repelling the Moslems
whose aim was to rule the world.
Labels: 1050, battle of hastings, edward the confessor, harold godwinson, william the conqueror
<< Home